(This is not a picture of me, but of Kaoru, guitarist for Dir en grey. I just thought the image fit the thoughtful mood of this post.)
I have been thinking quite a bit as of late about purpose and what it means to have one and how does one find the very purpose for which she or he exists. Many believe there is a "god" that sits upon a throne up high, floating on a bloated white cloud in an unnaturally blue sky, handing down such purposes like chores. This seems to me a trite way of thinking about purpose, but perhaps my opinions are too influenced by my inherent distrust of religion and the concept of heirarchy.
On a side note, I took a couple entertaining personality blog quizzes and uncovered that I value tolerance (a more accurate word would be acceptance) and humility highest of the noble values. Tolerance I already knew I valued, but I had never thought humility to be as great a importance to me primarily because I did not understand what it meant. I knew it had something to do with humbleness, but I did not realise that humility also involves a strong sense of of self-confidence and self-respect. It is not purely about modesty but of an understanding and acceptance of oneself so as to encourage an understanding and acceptance of others. So many human beings try to force their individual will and beliefs upon others as a way to make the world work better for themselves rather than realise that if we accept and respect each other's wills and beliefs, then perhaps the world will naturally change for the better. (Such is quite an idealistic and optimistic approach, but I do question as whether we are even capable as a species to be so open-minded towards the whole of our population.)
So then this would beg the question, why do we need governments and organized religions? I know it would be foolish of me to suggest that all organization must be done away with, for the fact that the more people there are upon this giant blue marble, the harder they are to guide in any one direction. Socialism- the concept of doing away with any class distinction and social heirarchy- is a good idea in theory, but at this point in the evolution of our species, are we really ready to take responsibility for a structure? Indeed, in order for a socialist society to succeed, there must be great individual responsibility taken for the upkeep of such an order, and let's face it: we're not ready for it. And we have seen how easily such a idea can be corrupted by the few who understand it the least and mutilated into something heinous, so what is to say it won't happen again?
I am not suggesting that the concept of "no class" is not humanly possible. (As a member the of the lower class, I really wish we could erase the line between wealth and poverty- indeed, I wish we could get rid of the concept of money altogether!) I believe it is, just not yet. Humanity is too far from that goal and to force such a structure to grow faster than it can reasonably is to invite corruption and disaster.
Of course, the structure of capitalistic society is no better. Extreme movement in either direction is dangerous to humanity, but how, then, do we balance individuality and community into a working society that benefits all equally?
Perhaps that is the purpose of humanity: to find out how to live in harmony with each other before we all kill each other?